Chapter 1: ‘The White Room’

White. I rouse to white. Every morning, every night. I yearn for the light piercing my eyes, the way the windows glistened from the morning dew but most of all I crave the feeling. The feeling I earned from a big night out, the amusement gained from every photo capturing a moment of euphoria. I miss my friends.

Waking up in a haze, a small leak in my room causes an endless cycle of rhythms giving me a headache. Reaching for my water I gulp it down faster than my throat can take, the cold affection almost gives me peace. My bed groans ever so slightly as I place my right foot onto the concrete floor radiating its numbing pain onto my skin. As I lean towards the door I miss the handle, hurling my body across the room to only meet the ground at an intimate level. The intimacy I used to feel from my boyfriend, the intimacy from my mum. Feeling my mind drift again I stand up in a rush and run out the door. I couldn’t tell you why I run to breakfast each morning, I don’t know what I’m running from, maybe my room, the white, the emptiness. I get to the line at the same time as a boy. I’ve seen him around before, I admire the way he walks, the way he keeps his head at level with the windows but most of all I admire the way he follows the rules. Standing only two feet in front of me he acknowledges me by a simple nod. Each time the line shuffles forward, a convulsion in my leg strikes me off balance. After the hands of the clock run circles around me, I find myself stationed in front of one of the bureaucratic ministers. “Open,” she says as if I wouldn’t know so myself. My mouth widens with ease and two small pills rest on the top of my tongue. I can’t help but cringe at the taste. Walking back towards my room is the most dreaded part of the day. Not because of the white anymore but because of the window. The window that sits their like its waiting patiently for its next victim. I can’t help but take a glimpse of what my life used to be like. I gaze at the streets I used to stroll down, the corner shop that was never missed on a morning stroll. And there it is, my home. My city, my school, my life. A singular tear wells in my left eye taking me by surprise. Emotions like that can end you up in cleansing. Every day I find myself wondering what my life would be like if climate change didn’t destroy our planet. If the bureaucratic ministry didn’t take over our city, our lives. My thoughts are interrupted by a siren, the blaring ring oscillates the walls of the edifice as I struggle to keep my balance. We hear this siren a few times a day, it doesn’t scare me now as it used to when I first witnessed a person jump. I remember the thud of their limp body hitting the ground on impact, the screams of the people from below. The bureaucratic ministry always tries to cover these things up, it’s only a matter of time until that’s me.

The afternoon sun watches down on me engrossed as I endure my last meal of the day. My belly has never felt full since we left the city but complaining is too much energy for me to muster. After dinner I saunter down the white vestibule towards my room, it isn’t my room, but in these times I will take what I can. This day my eyes don’t deviate, my hands don’t touch, my thoughts don’t dominate. I am inanimate. Strolling, unrushed towards the door I extend my arm to the knob but I am stopped by a sight I never hoped to see. It’s open. I knew I closed it before dinner. My heart begins to pulsate, my legs too stiff to move. The sweat locked in my palm begins to drip out onto the flooring. Without warning the entrance swings wide open. I am knocked back, only saved by the walls encompassing me. And there she was, sitting on my fabric like it was her room, her home, her property. I stumble my words but the only thing to come out was a strained note of fear. The room seems whiter than usual, the walls feel closer to my skin. The brown-haired girl without making eye contact speaks. I never knew we were allowed to speak to one another, it was of course prohibited in the atrium. “What are you doing standing their like that, we don’t have much time”. I raise my eyebrows as if she knew who she was talking to. “Sorry?” I muster out of my throat. “The ministry doesn’t take long to eat, hurry up or we will be dog food.” She speaks in such confidence. I imagine her on top of a pedestal singing to a crowd of protestors, being the leading voice, the hope in some fucked up imaginary setting. Without hesitating, she grabs me by the hand leading me down a vestibule of anticipation. I follow. I don’t know what else to do. We walk with momentum towards an entrance I have never distinguished before. They all tend to look the same after a period of time. Without opening she rotates her slender body to face mine, our noses brush up against one another. “Sorry, how rude of me, I should introduce myself. I’m Beth”.

Speech, Annabel Carter

This is a condom!. Now I would hope this whole class knows what it is and how it works by now. See not only does it prevent sexually transmitted diseases. But it also prevents these things. So why am I up here today standing behind a picture of a harmless child? Because we must face the hard truth. There are 7.8 billion people on earth. 195 countries and 10,000 cities.  Not only that, 8.7 million different species share that space. Earth is overpopulated, the increasing pressure on the planet’s limited resources shows us an unsustainable future.  Our harmless actions are killing each other and we have to recognize it before it’s too late. Can I just see a show of hands who wants children in the future? Now keep your hand up if you personally would like to conceive them. This is the problem we are facing, with more and more people being brought into the world and fewer families willing to adopt or foster children, We are breeding like rabbits with the thought of the future behind us. 

Global population has risen so fast in the last century that 14% of all human beings that have walked this earth are still alive today, that is a terrifying statistic. By around 2024 India is set to overtake China in population numbers, while Nigeria which is currently the seventh-highest populated country will surpass the United States and become the 3rd more populated country by 2050. While fertility levels in 1st world countries are declining, 3rd world country’s rates are increasing drastically. Thomas Malthus a name that I bet none of you have ever heard before, a man that was so significant but was silenced by his own society. He warned us about overpopulation in the 18th century. He knew the rapid growth was completely unsustainable and if we were to continue to live with one another we had to begin the fight straight away. 

More people means more carbon footprints, more transport, more emissions, more waste, more housing, more infrastructure, more mouths to feed, more energy usage, more food production. To name a few. So where do we draw the line? How many is too many? Part of the problem varies across the globe on our resource consumption. For example, an average middle-class American consumes around 3.3 times the subsistence level of food and around 250 times the subsistence level of drinking water. So if this was the case and everyone lived a middle-class life and consumed that exact amount the globe would have the capacity to fit 2 billion people. However, if everyone consumed only what they needed we could fit much more. But this isn’t the case. So what are our options now that we are reaching a point of overpopulation? 

China has already set the example.

A one child policy amongst families.

If families were only allowed to have one child then birth rates would decrease significantly. Those that struggle to support their large family numbers will excel without the burden of trying to feed every family member. This law that would be in every country around the globe could be the solution to our problem, our goal in carbon neutralizing the planet would happen. By numbers alone, China’s one-child policy has been said to be the most successful population control initiative ever. Let’s follow by example, take charge and save this planet. If you don’t think we should have a one-child policy amongst families then you are okay with innocent people dying. You are okay with poverty and you are okay with global warming. 

Another solution we could use to get the population down to a controllable level has already happened before our eyes.

A virus.

The coronavirus has taken us all by storm, the sheer damage that it has done, people only think about the negative effects. Although on this day 9.18 million people have died they were mostly the elderly and had already lived their lives, this dramatic drop in population has seen all positive effects on our environment. Greenhouse gas emissions have dropped, our carbon footprints stopped, and 9.18 million less contribute to global warming. If we were to say every 100 years release a virus big enough but controllable enough to bring the population down to a sustainable level then why not? It would target those with lower immune and respiratory systems. A plague known as the black death lingered on for centuries and killed 25 million people in the 14th century, at the time that was 60% of Europe’s population. The Spanish flu pandemic in 1918 is known as the deadliest in history infecting a third of the world’s population and killing more than 50 million. Pandemics that kill off a large number of populations have acute and lasting effects on society and the environment. Depopulations are socially transformative. For those who survived plagues life, in general, was better, improving job opportunities, lifestyle living, and housing and traveling. Does this not sound like paradise? it sure does to me. 

You all know the movie Wall E?  Wall E. The lovable robot who lives on Earth after the human race has fled to space after destroying their planet. A robot has been left to clean up the mess humans had made. Do we want this to be our future? Are we not going to do anything about this and then bring robots into the picture like come on. Robots can’t clean up our mess, we have to. 

Senicide

A historical practice that included the mass killing of the elderly and the weak as they were seen as not necessary for the survival of a village. If we brought this practice back to life in modern society we would not need to worry about the overpopulation and economic stress of housing old people. Those that did not meet the standards of an ideal being were to be slaughtered. Think of it more as a “sacrifice”. Everyone in this room should be willing to sacrifice themselves for the greater good of other people, I would not think any less of you. 

Why do we think the theme of overpopulation in movies draws audiences in so much? Because we are facing the same problem, we can relate to these motion pictures in one way or another. 

In Avengers infinity war how was Thanos seen as the bad guy? He spoke nothing but the truth. He knew what overpopulation felt like and he finally did something about it. Ok maybe wiping out half of the population isn’t the answer but he was the only one that recognized the problem and tried to find a solution. He quotes “This universe has limited resources… if life is left unchecked, life will cease to exist. It needs correcting” Maybe we should stop placing a villain role on those that expose the human race and instead listen to them. 

Today I have discussed three efficient ways to control the Earth’s population, if we were to implement them all we would have hoped to see a sustainable future for our children and their future relatives. But the truth is the pace of Earth’s population growth is so quick that even restrictions on children, diseases, and senicide will still leave the world with too many people for it to sustain. Earth is dying and you’ve heard it here first. Thank you. 

Identify 5 political and social references and research their details online. Create a paragraph summary of each reference, including as many facts as you can muster.

1st reference: “So the fact that they now let women serve could actually be seen as a deeply pessimistic move.” The reference that Frankie Boyle was using was implying the new rule that was set in late 2013 where the first women were allowed to work in the submarines. This then leads to jokes about being able to repopulate our population within the submarines when the end of the world is near. Women had previously been excluded from subs as reports of carbon dioxide poising were high and at-risk towards them but recent research shows that these accusations were not true.

2nd reference: “The PM has derided Jeremy Corbyn’s idea of keeping the subs without missiles as patently ridiculous and in no way comparable to building two huge aircraft carriers with no aircraft.” This reference is describing Jeremy Corbyn’s suggestion to the UK that all Trident submarines were not to carry nuclear-powered weaponry. The labour leader raised the suggestion as a possible compromise to protect the jobs of workers who will build replacement Trident submarines.

3rd reference:

Identify 3 language features that Frankie Boyle uses to strengthen his satire. (Options are: Hyperbole, Metaphor, Analogy, etc)

Select your controversial idea from yesterday and now develop a couple of paragraphs, where you build on to this sentence with some more elaborate metaphors and analogies.

Speech internal, Annabel Carter

Will we ever find a significant excuse to end a person’s life in order to reach justice or satisfaction?

A gas chamber, a gun, electrocution, lethal injection. 1507 men and women have died due to these forms of execution in the United States alone since the 1970s. 

Will we ever find a significant excuse to end a person’s life in order to reach justice or satisfaction?

The death penalty is a form of capitol punishment used to bring justice and peace to the family and friends of a victim. It is used towards those who have committed such unlawful acts that results in their own death. The death penalty is still used to this day in a number of state prisons around the globe and still as backlash and discussion has arisen from this controversial way of life there has been no indication of the abolishment of this punishment in a number of countries. We are living in a world where we abide by the rules of society. Our morals and values overturn every action we make which is sending a message to the people in the wider world around us.  Do we want our children growing up in a world where an “Eye for an eye” is the acceptable norm? The first perspective I will be discussing is that the death penalty does not abide by correct morals and should be abolished. And my second perspective is that the death penalty is a necessary tool in keeping peace in society and should be used as a form of capitol punishment.

In “And Then There Were None” a man by the name of Justice Wargrave worked in a courthouse and was responsible for sentencing people who have committed offences to their death. An example was when Wargrave was responsible for sending a man whom the jury believed was innocent to be hanged, later we found out that man was guilty of murder and Wargrave was just doing his job. Quoted “Justice comes to all”. This example shows us that it may not be the jury or judges fault in sentencing someone to their death as they are merely doing the job they have been given. 

The first perspective that I will be discussing is that the death penalty does not abide by correct morals and should be abolished. 

Since 1973, more than 160 people have been released from death row with evidence of complete innocence, many of these being minutes away from their fate. 

The torture these criminals have had to endure by being led to their deathbeds is inhumane and no person should ever have to go through with this. How many more of us must die to reach satisfaction? Everyday people are sentenced to death for a variety of crimes, in some countries this can be related to drug offences and in others, counter terrorism and murder. People spend years waiting for their trial and do not know when their last day will come. The death penalty is the ultimate cruel, degrading punishment that dates back to this day and should not be continued. “The death penalty is simply a symptom of a culture of violence, not a solution to it”. 

The use of the death penalty for under the ages of 18 is prohibited under the human acts law but yet some country’s still sentence and execute juvenile defendants. Since 1990, Amnesty International has recorded and dated 145 executions of child offenders in 10 different countries. At the time of writing, Iran has executed at least 97 child offenders since 1990. 

There has been no indication that the death penalty does deter crime. Countries who use the penalty as a away of punishment cite it as a way to stop people from committing that particular unlawful act. But this claim has no evidence that the death sentence is any more effective in reducing rates than a life sentence would be. Another point to make is that the controversial sentence is irreversible, and when mistakes can happen there is no possibility of going back. Execution is the ultimate irreversible punishment and the execution of an innocent person can never be eliminated. 

Within the walls of the courthouse the weight of the penalty given can be strongly carried against those with less advantages in social economic backgrounds and ethnic groups. This includes having limited resources to legal representation and having a greater disadvantage in their knowledge of the criminal justice system. 

Criminals must have a form of punishment so they are able to recognise the crimes they have committed but the death penalty deprives people of the opportunity to reform. If we treat humans like animals they will act like animals. We need to find a solution to better decrease our crime rates and killing people isn’t the answer.

The second opinion I will be discussing is that the death penalty is a necessary tool in keeping peace in society and should be continued as a form of capitol punishment.

Ted Bundy, America’s most notorious serial killer and rapist of the late 20th century was executed by electric chair in the state of Florida in 1989. What was the crime that lead to this severe punishment. Bundy is known to of murdered at least 36 women but officials believe the number is closer to 100. His killings often followed a gruesome pattern, he raped them then brutally killed, showing no mercy. One of his victims being a girl named Kimberly leach, Kimberly was 12 years old at the time. In trial Bundy fought for his life but was convicted and sentenced to death, spending nine years on death row before his execution. This is just one example in which the crime committed had a fair punishment. No family member, no friend should be able to see their victims killer ever out. The thought that they are living within a state prison may cause serious harm to the mental health of others.

The death sentence in the United States is only given to those who have committed such foul crimes that have taken away a person’s life and ability to succeed. The majority of Americans to be correct 54% of the country still approve of executing perpetrators despite the risk that an innocent may be killed. They believe that real justice requires people to suffer for their wrongdoing. The harder the crime the harder the time, and in case of murder this may result in death. Inflicting an appropriate punishment towards the criminal is in the manner in which the Jury responds to society’s cry for justice against the criminal.

Having looked through both perspectives on the death penalty, I truly believe execution from the government does not abide by correct morals and should be abolished. I believe that the values we set for ourselves and the community hinder what future generations may see as right. I do not want this form of capital punishment to go on for any longer as there has been no evidence in it actually working for reducing rates in crime and it seems to be more of a threat to society than a real solution. “There is no justice in killing in the name of justice”.

In conclusion of this speech we have discussed two totally different perspectives for and against capitol punishment of the death penalty.Weve discussed how crime rate does not decrease due to this punishment, how offenders are stripped of their right to reform and what values we believe in in society to bring us to this penalty. We know a bit more about Ted Bundy and his right to die due to the penalty as he took away a large number people’s right to live. We found the significance in the novel “And Then There Were None” where Justice Wargrave was just completing his duty to sentence people to death. Ive exaplined my own perspective in believing wrong in the death penalty how this is not the correct way to stop rates and how the real solution is yet o come. 

Now I will ask you one last time, Will we ever find a significant excuse to end a person’s life in order to reach justice or satisfaction? 

Thank you. 



6th Reading log

Global Warming, Greta Thunberg

(speech)

“You are not mature enough to tell it like it is. You are failing us”

Greta Thunberg presents a powerful talk on the effects global warming is having on our planet right now. Greta condems world leaders in an emotional speech at the U.N in front of hundreds of politicians. The 16 year old swedish girl states the “Betrayal” of how young people globally feel of the environment they are living in.

Justice is portrayed through this speech as Greta has been fighting for the recognition of global warming since she was young. Although most politicians in the Union still refuse to believe the effects that this is having. Greta is only one voice out of millions of children who feel as though they are being let down by the lack of interest in the most important of topics. Days after Greta’s speech, millions of teenagers protested in the streets for immediate action in global warming. Most were walking out of class for this protest to make sure all their voices were heard as they have no regard to be ignored anymore. World leaders had gathered to discuss their efforts in reducing carbon emissions from big companies. But Thunberg presented that nothing would be done about this although cutting down on greenhouse gasses could eliminate the risk of a catastrophic climate breakdown. 

I believe that Greta is making her voice heard loud and clear. The speech to the Union was filled with emotion demanding not asking for but instead making a point in what we must do instead of what we could do. “The eyes of all future generations are upon you. And if you choose to fail us I say we will never forgive you. We will not let you get away with this. Right here, right now is where we draw the line.” Meanwhile China refused to put forward any new measures to stop climate change. Greta’s summit was to was designed to address the climate crisis amid increasing warning of environmental scientists on the catastrophic events that might take place if we do not take action immediately.

Greta is not only fighting for her own justice but the justice of millions of youth globally. We are going to have to live in this world when we are older as a consequence of the previous generations actions. I feel as though the young people of this world have to clean up the mess of the elders and it is not fair. I personally think Greta is our strongest path into fixing this problem as she has sparked wide discussion within the politicians of the world. By speaking to the commissioners they have the power to decrease the carbon footprint within their country. 

This speech made me reflect on the future that me and my own children may have to grow up in. I do not want to live in a world where I am faced with the decision of starting my own family if they are not going to be able to survive in these conditions. The extremity of this global crisis is huge and we need everyone to be educated on the effects this will have for ourselves and future generations to come. Personally I thought Greta’s speech to the Union was so powerful and inspiring. I believe this will inspire more of the youth to get out and take action by protests and other forms to stop global warming. I know it has made me more aware of the effects this crisis will have and as she said “We are the beginning of a mass extinction”. This quote is extremely powerful as how true it is becoming.

Not only within my personal life is this effecting me but yet as continuing evidence has arisen that we need to take action to this global crisis immediately, there is a number of world leaders that refuse to take in the information being given to them as they will not reduce there carbon emissions. Donald Trump the current President of the United States reports that he does not simply “Believe in it”. After a report came out called “The fourth national climate assessment” which outlines the potential impacts that this global climate change will have across every sector of America society. The report notes the effects the country is facing already due to this crisis yet Trump refuses to come to terms with the potential lethal outcome this country will face. Trump is only one example of a world leader refusing t abide for the benefit for the world and if this continues the quotes said in Greta’s speech will come reality.

5th Reading log

“Same Love”, Macklemore and Ryan Lewis

(Song)

“I can’t change even if i try, even if I wanted to” 

Same love written and performed by Maclemore and Ryan lewis is a power anthem describing the effects that young gay people face in today’s society. The song begins with an acoustic piano track which creates an immediate emotional response from the listener. The song was apart of their 2012 album and reached number 1 on the record charts in Australia and New Zealand and was nominated for song of the year at the Grammys.The song was recorded during the referndum campaign which upon approval came to legalise same sex marriage in the United States of America. 

The song raises important issues like homosexuality, black culture and acceptance within its community. The lyrics in the song tackle important issues faced by the LGBTQ+ individuals. The lyrics state that being homosexual is a “choice” and it quote “Can be cured with some treament and religion, man made rewiring of a predisposition”.

The Song portrays the theme of justice throughout its lyrics as gay people have been constantly fighting for their rights to be excepted into society. It describes the feelings of dispear homosexual individuals including the youth have to endure as the consequences as coming out which they face with public humiliation, bullying and judgement they suffer due to their own sexual orientation.  “When kids are walking ‘round the hallway plagued by pain in their heart/A world so hateful some would rather die than be who they are.” In the world that we live in people are constantly searching for the approval of others, meaning never finding it. This is the biggest problem they face today, not being accepted for who they are can lead people down the darkest of roads and their mental health becomes damaged severely. 

Although this song has caused some controversy around the world. A Michigan highschool teacher was suspended after playing “Same love” to his students as the lyrics are about homosexuality. This incident just reinforced the idea that the LGBTQ+ community still has a long way to go to be accepted and may never be. The continual fight for equality and justice to the people comes in many forms, one of them being this song. The promotion of gay rights through music is very sucessful as everyone loves listening to music. Music is also a very accessible resource to most people who can gather this off websites like youtube which is free to use. 

I personally support the LGBTQ+ community greatly and believe this song has gotten a lot of recognition for the right reasons. I can see how much homosexual people will stuggle with coming out to their own friends and family in fear or regection because of culture or beliefs. I understand that this can lead individuals to do the worst to themselves or others, this is why educating particular the senior years about acceptance and the rights of their freedom is so important in this time. Young gay people are dealing the ultimate fight for justice. 

4th Reading log

Annabel Carter

Fruitvale station 

(Film)

“You shot me! I got a daughter!”

Fruitvale station a film which sticks closely to the facts of the unlawful killing of a young black man in 2009. An African American man by the name of Oscar Grant 111 was fatally shot by a white police officer inside Fruitvale Station on New Year’s day. The film begins with real life video footage of the shooting of Grant in the station, then it backtracks that one night and the life he portrays. 

By placing the real cellphone footage at the beginning of the film the viewer is already captivated into the story and holds an emotional response and personal view of the situation before even learning about his story. I personally felt anger and frustration towards the white officer from this first scene without even knowing his reasonings behind it. The events that followed in Fruitvale Station is a significant historical shooting of one ordinary man, that has raised debates on the unlawful killings of white officers to date against people of colour. 

The films time frame is set all in one day, New Years day. Grant had recently been fired from his job in the supermarket and was struggling to keep up with bills in his house to feed and sustain his daughter with his girlfriend. Hi past life had included selling drugs and having a hard time in prison and as he had to earn money in some way he resorted back to drug selling on the streets. Grant portrays kindness and is family oriented for most of the time, although he can be shown to be a complicated character, with an uncontrollable temper at times. He also has the tendency to lie about not cheating on his girlfriend and getting fired from his day job. 

Throughout the film Grant is portrayed as a caring genuine guy but one scene is said to be too far reaching in making the audience feel sympathetic towards him, it is when he comforts a dying dog on the street who had just been hit, this scene is fictional and never happened in the real grants time. It is supposed to change the viewers perception on Grant to feel and emotional response and become understanding of his actions but personally I did not find myself feeling sorry for him as the cinematography of the whole scene seemed a little too set up. 

As the film navigates through Grants day it all builds up to reach the climax of the story where Grant with three other black men lay face down on the floor of Fruitvale Station. On the 1st of January 2009 Officer Johannes Mehserle fatally shot Oscar Grant 111 in the back. Bystanders filmed the whole ordeal and pleaded to the jury that Grant did not pose any threatening evidence towards the officer and the officer had no motive to shoot the man. The theme of justice does not just come from Grants family and friends but instead a whole nation backs him, justice needs to be served to this police officer of the unlawful killing. More outrage was turned when the white officer was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter when he said he mistook his gun for a taser this is a lesser charge of voluntary manslaughter which the public were hoping for. The film focuses on Grants family and friends instead of the police officer and the effects this has had on them to this day. 

I believe Fruitvalle station is a fair portrayal of Oscar Grant’s story and the justice millions of people fought so hard for him but was never received by the court. This brilliant portrait of how lack of opportunity, incarceration and racism conspire together to continually devalue the lives of young black men in America today. Fruitvale station stuck out to me as it highlights so clearly the challenges coloured people of America are facing to this day. The recurring problems with white police officers I seem to see on the news so frequently scares me as I do not want this to be the world I or my children will grow up in. I cannot imagine just how hard life would be for Grants family and friends after this tragic event. 

“I told him to take the train. I told him to catch the BART. I didn’t know they were gonna hurt my baby. I should’ve just let him drive. I should’ve let him drive, but I wanted to keep him safe. You gotta let me hug him. Please, let me hug him. Please. Please! He didn’t like to be alone”.  

This film made me reflect on my own privileges on my race and ethnic backgrounds. I live in a wealthy town that is sheltered from all the hatred that we see out in the real world. I can not begin to think about if I were in his shoes and what sacrifices I would make for the greater good of my own family. I have had no personal experience with feeling threatened by a police officer and I feel as though I shall not come across as a result of my privileges. I have not been discriminated against because of the colour of my skin and have not had to experience racial prejudice.

In a wider world context people of colour are constantly being threatened by police officers which may result in their own unlawful death. Every time I turn on the news it seems as though their is a new story on the unlawful killing of a black man by a police officer, many of them being unarmed and not threatening to anybody’s life. Not only do we hear these stories from overseas but within our own soil. New Zealand is one of the most ethically diverse country’s on earth, We have spent years trying to fix our racial discrimination and it feels as though we are reaching a solution, now its up to us to keep it that way. There have been a number of instances within the United States when 911 calls have been given to everyday people of colour that may simply just of been walking down the street. Marc Peeples a 32 year old black man was the subject to a number of 911 calls when he decided to plant seeds in a field to create a garden for himself and his family. After some time the allegations against him became more serious all who made those allegations were white. He ended up going to trial and spent time behind bars for simply trying to help out his community. This is just one example of the everyday struggles people of colour have to face on a day to day basis just like Grant had to endure during Fruitville Station.

3rd Reading log

Annabel Carter

The hate you give 

(Novel)

“What’s the point of having a voice if you’re gonna be silent in those moments you shouldn’t be?”

The hate you give is a book based on the following events of white privilege, community and the criminal justice system. We believe every person should have a right to an education, food, water and shelter. A right of treating everyone with the same respect and attitude disregarding any colour, religion or sexual orientation. This novel portrays a first person’s outlook on events which highlight each of these categories and a families ultimate fight for justice. 

The story follows a 16 year old black girl named Starr Carter and her life within a white privileged school. Starr moves between worlds; the poor neighbourhood where she lives and the fancy white suburban prep school she attends. Her life is complicated on a day to day basis but when she witnesses the fatal shooting of her best friend Khalil at the hands of a white police officer her life shatters into pieces. By 16 star becomes the protagonist of the book as she deals with the loss of two of her best friends, all of whom are coloured, one by gang violence and one from the bullet of a white police officer. As the sole and only witness of the fatal shooting of Khalil the novel follows Stars overwhelming pressure of testifying before the grand jury to seek justice in Khalil’s name. As the incident unfolds within court, Stars two worlds begin to collide, in weekdays she is attended a prestigious private school where there she is known as the one “black girl”, while on the weekends she comes home to a suburban neighbourhood ridiculed with gang violence and drugs. Her former gang member dad is fighting to make their neighbourhood a better place while her mum is suggesting to move completely out to keep the family safe. 

The theme of justice begins when Star begins fighting in court for Khalil’s justice a new narrative begins, one that points at Khalil’s actions towards the white suburban cop, this being portrayed as a heavy drug user that threatened a cop with a “deadly weapon”. This “deadly weapon” was a hairbrush. Star has a great sense of courage and challenges these false statements in court which is framing her best friend out to be someone he is not. The novel begins to highlight the important issues of interracial teenagers in this time. The intimate first person account shows Stars full emotional response through the shock, pain and outrage of the aftermath of these shootings. 

As a result of this the reader is able to see the full complexity of their lives as they may be going through or have seen similar experiences in life which connects the reader on a deeper understanding. The novel goes on to show credible counter-arguments against Star and her neighbourhood and the court of law, these different narratives are often presented by authoritarian figures above Star and her race which are echoed by media outlets showing recent shootings of young black men. The hate you give confronts the reader of just how much racialized violence is taken out on young black youth and illustrates how young people of colour like Star who might speak out front to defend their late friends or family members will be unfairly criticized for their actions to take back justice. This novel understands deeply the real dangers young people of colour are having against white cops and the criminal justice system. 

Once again “The deceased get put on trial, rather than their killers”. 

I personally believe this novel portrays the black society and problems with white police officers so honestly, the challenges they face on a day to day basis makes me wonder how lucky I am to be where I am today. I do not face these problems and can only imagine how hard it would be living your life as today may be your last.